Authors:
- Lesley McMillan Department of Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University - Google Scholar, Wikipedia

- Deborah White, Department of Sociology, Trent University - ORCID, ResearchGate

Abstract: »In response to unceasing rates of sexual assault, and the failure of statutory interventions to reduce the prevalence of sexual violence, several prevention strategies have emerged. Over the past fifty years, initiatives have included awareness raising campaigns, provision of self-defence training, promotion of rape alarms, and education-based efforts in the form of bystander intervention and consent training workshops aimed at encouraging prosocial action to reduce sexual violence. More recently, a striking array of technologies has emerged claiming the capacity to prevent or mitigate the risk of sexual violence including apps that harness the communication functions of smart technology and a variety of ‘wearables’ designed to protect the body from assault or repel a would-be assailant. In this paper we analyse these prevention initiatives in the modern period, demonstrating that what is striking about the majority is the relative absence of the perpetrator in both design and endorsement. Where an assailant is alluded to, this ‘imagined perpetrator’ tends to reflect stereotypical constructions of how sexual violence occurs and who commits it. The consequence of such representations is that many prevention efforts place responsibility onto potential victims to protect themselves, contributing further to widespread misunderstandings about the realities of rape and rapists.« (Source: Women's History Review)

Contents:

	Abstract (p. 1040)
	Introduction (p. 1040)
	Self-defence (p. 1042)
	Bystander prevention (p. 1043)
	Anti-Rape technology (p. 1045)
	Public Safety Campaigns (p. 1047)
	Consequences and implications (p. 1050)
	Conclusion (p. 1052)
	Notes (p. 1052)
	Disclosure statement (p. 1058)
	Notes on contributors (p. 1058)

Wikipedia: Sex and the law: Rape / History of rape